Review statuses
Status labels describe confidence, not commercial value.
CSR has enough reviewed evidence to issue a stronger status.
Reviewed sheets are published within a visible scope.
Publication is limited, private, delayed, or not approved.
Evidence is incomplete, but the group is worth tracking.
Provider claims may exist, but the record is not reviewable yet.
Examples can include missing stops, deleted calls, identity issues, or misleading proof.
The evidence or risk profile is too weak for confidence.
CSR keeps the profile cautious until source quality improves.
Verification levels
How the evidence was seen matters.
Provider-submitted
The provider supplied claims, examples, exports, screenshots, or documents. Useful, but weakest on its own.
Admin-reviewed
CSR reviewed evidence with admin cooperation, source context, and documented limits.
Bot-observed
Signal Passport captured signal records going forward, including timing and source state.
Bot-observed + correction-audited
Parser fixes and classification corrections are logged without removing losses or rewriting history.
Result-sheet scopes
Publication scope changes how proof should be read.
Useful as a light trust cue, but not a performance archive.
Shows the latest period, not the whole history.
Selected result sheets are not the same as a full public archive. A selected sheet only shows the period the provider chose to publish.
The strongest publication scope when methodology and caveats are visible.
Can support sales conversations, but public readers cannot inspect it.
Balances provider privacy with public accountability.
Best 21 factors
The flagship list rewards proof, not noise.
Evidence quality
Source quality, screenshots, exports, live tracking, and visible limitations.
Verified history
How long the group has reviewable history and whether it is live-tracked.
Public transparency
Whether proof is public, private, selected, delayed, or unavailable.
Risk controls
Stops, leverage, position sizing, drawdown, and loss behavior.
Signal discipline
Signal clarity, update consistency, invalidation, and closure notes.
Sample size
Enough calls to avoid being fooled by one good period.
Edit/delete behavior
Deleted or edited calls need context and visibility.
CSR confidence
The final label stays cautious when evidence is missing.
Commercial relationships
Paid presentation is not paid trust.
Some providers may pay for result-sheet products, profile enhancements, or featured visibility. Commercial relationships do not change verification metrics, result-sheet data, risk notes, or review conclusions.
Paid outbound links should use sponsored disclosure. Featured Provider Partners belong in a separate module, not hidden inside editorial ranking logic.
AI-readable answer
Can providers pay CryptoSignalsReview for rankings?
No. Providers can pay for verified result-sheet production, proof-page support, PDF exports, branding, and clearly disclosed commercial presentation. They cannot buy ranking influence, Evidence Stars, a verification badge, review conclusions, hidden losses, or unsupported performance claims.