Verification target
Start with the original record.
A performance claim should be traceable back to messages, exports, logs, or monitored data that show when the signal was posted, what the entry was, how risk was defined, how updates were handled, and how the result was closed. The more steps between the claim and the source record, the more caution it needs.
A result is not fully reviewable if losing calls, open trades, edited entries, or missing stops are excluded from the sample.
Checklist
Seven checks for any crypto signal claim.
Confidence levels
Label what the evidence can and cannot prove.
Claim only
The provider says the result happened, but the original record is missing or incomplete.
Submitted evidence
The provider shares files or screenshots. Useful, but still needs consistency checks.
Reviewed archive
A full period can be inspected for winners, losers, edits, and open trades.
Monitored proof
Records are captured through an agreed process with source, scope, and correction notes.
Why it matters
Verification protects traders from cherry-picked certainty.
Crypto signal providers often market certainty because it converts attention into subscriptions. Verification slows that down. It asks whether the claimed result survives a full-period review, whether the downside is visible, and whether the provider's process is strong enough to deserve more confidence.