Fast answer
Crypto signal slippage checks compare the alert price with executable prices.
Before accepting a crypto signal result, record the alert timestamp, expected entry, executed fill, order type, pair liquidity, spread, order size, volatility, alert delay, fees, and final close record.
If a provider reports entries or exits without showing fill assumptions, spread, alert delay, and liquidity context, the result may not be copyable.
Execution checks
What to inspect in crypto signal slippage records.
Alert delay
A fast move between the provider alert and follower execution can change both entry quality and stop distance.
Order type
Market orders can fill quickly but may accept worse prices; limit orders can miss fills entirely.
Liquidity depth
Thin order books and small altcoin pairs can produce different fills for different follower sizes.
Close price realism
Exit slippage matters too, especially during stopouts, news moves, liquidation cascades, or low-liquidity hours.
Source context
Slippage is the gap between expected and executed price.
Coinbase describes spread as the difference between current market price and the buy or sell price, and slippage as a possible difference between quoted and final execution. Binance also explains that slippage can happen when the final trade price differs from the request, especially with market orders. Crypto signal checks should preserve both the alert price and the fill assumption.
Review standard
A reviewable slippage record separates signal quality from fill quality.
For CSR evidence review, crypto signal slippage records should include original alerts, expected price, fill assumption, order type, spread, depth, alert delay, follower-size limits, fees, and final status.