Fast answer
Crypto signal scale-in checks prove how added entries changed risk.
Before accepting a scale-in result, record each add-on entry, filled size, average entry, stop level, total exposure, leverage, liquidation distance, and final outcome.
If a provider averages down or adds to a winner without showing size and stop changes, the risk math is not reviewable.
Trade-management checks
What to inspect in scale-in signal records.
Add-on trigger
Each extra entry should have a stated trigger, timestamp, price, size, and venue context.
Average entry
The record should recalculate average entry after each fill rather than only showing the best price.
Risk change
Stops, leverage, margin mode, liquidation distance, and account-risk percentage can change after every add-on.
Outcome math
Final results should use the combined size and average entry, including partial fills and costs.
Source context
Scale-in signals change position size and order math.
TradingView position tools include entry, stop, target, and position-size fields, while Binance Academy explains position sizing as a risk-management process. Crypto signal checks should connect every add-on entry to the updated size and risk boundary.
Review standard
A reviewable scale-in signal records every added unit.
For CSR evidence review, scale-in records should include the original alert, all add-on alerts, filled sizes, average entry after each fill, stop changes, leverage, margin mode, liquidation context, fees, and final close.