Fast answer
Crypto signal paper trading needs realistic execution settings and live-transition labels.
Before accepting paper-trading results from a crypto signal provider, identify whether alerts were timestamped before price moves, what fill price was assumed, whether fees and slippage were included, how missed entries were handled, and when simulated tracking changed to live-forward tracking.
If paper results do not show realistic fees, slippage, delayed-alert handling, missed fills, and a clear simulation label, keep them separate from live signal evidence.
Simulation checks
What to inspect in crypto signal paper-trading records.
Real-time timestamping
Signals should be recorded before or at alert time. Backfilled entries after a price move are not the same as paper trading.
Fill realism
Check whether the paper account used bid/ask spreads, market depth, order size, fees, funding, and realistic entry windows.
Missed and partial fills
A clean record should show skipped trades, late alerts, partial fills, and signals that never reached the stated entry.
Simulation label
Paper-trading records should stay labeled as simulation and should not be blended with live-executed result sheets.
Source context
Paper trading is practice, not live result proof.
Investopedia describes paper trading as simulated trading without real money and notes that it can help practice while lacking real financial exposure. For crypto signals, simulated results should remain separate from live-forward evidence.
Review standard
A reviewable paper-trading record labels simulation limits clearly.
For CSR evidence review, crypto signal paper-trading records should preserve alert timestamps, simulated fill logic, fee and slippage assumptions, missed-entry rules, skipped-trade labels, funding or margin assumptions, and the date when live-forward tracking began. Simulation can support process review, not live performance proof.