Fast answer
Miner-reserve signal checks prove whether wallet attribution, reserve change, miner flow, price context, and timing were visible.
Before accepting a miner reserve signal, record the data provider, miner wallet coverage, reserve level, inflow or outflow window, exchange-flow context, BTC price, signal timestamp, trade plan, invalidation, updates, and final result.
If a provider says miners are selling without showing miner wallets, reserve change, and whether coins moved to exchanges, the claim is too broad.
Miner checks
What to inspect in bitcoin miner reserve signal records.
Wallet attribution
Miner wallet labels and pool coverage can change, so the provider must name the data source and caveats.
Reserve versus flow
A reserve decline, miner outflow, and exchange deposit are related but not identical evidence.
Price context
Miner behavior has to be reviewed against BTC price, fees, hash price, and broader market structure.
Signal timing
The trade record should show whether the miner data was posted before or after the price move.
Source context
Miner reserve data can frame supply pressure, but wallet labeling and flow context matter.
CryptoQuant describes miner reserve as the amount of coins held by affiliated miner wallets, and its miner-flow documentation says miner metrics include reserves, inflows, outflows, hashrate, revenue, and workers. A signal should therefore show whether it is reading reserves, flows, or exchange-bound movement.
Review standard
A reviewable miner-reserve signal separates miner balance context from sell-pressure proof.
For CSR evidence review, miner-reserve records should include source, miner wallet coverage, reserve change, inflow or outflow window, exchange-flow context, BTC price, signal timestamp, invalidation, updates, and final outcome.