# Zignaly - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/zignaly-z-indexes-profit-sharing-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
Zignaly is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Zignaly
- Canonical entity record: Zignaly
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Pooled profit-sharing and rules-based crypto portfolio app candidate
- Platform context: Web app / Managed social investment
- Language context: English
- Region context: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines / South Africa
- Known aliases: Zignaly, Zignaly app, Zignaly Profit Sharing, Z-Indexes

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - resultsEvidence is state not-found: no independently audited or third-party-verified performance record exists, and the only performance material is the self-published 'Z-Indexes Performance Report – December 2025' (dated 6 January 2026, 'Prepared by Zignaly Research' from 'internal marketplace data'), a single-month aggregate index-return table with approximate drawdown figures that the packet records under providerClaims rather than as an observed results record (https://zignaly.com/z-indexes/performance/report-december-2025, fetched 2026-07-22) — no usable, loss-inclusive result record for any named strategy or period is available, so 0.; Identity and accountability 2/2 - The Terms of Service name the contracting entities as Highend Technologies LLC (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, LLC No. 852 LLC 2021) together with Merritt Administrators Proprietary Limited (South Africa, registration No. 2013/189063/07, registered office 1 Hood Avenue, Rosebank, Johannesburg, FSCA Category II Discretionary FSP Licence No. 46517), the About page names the co-founders Bart R. Bordallo (CEO), A. Rafay Gadit (CFO) and David Rodríguez (CMO) plus ten further named staff, and an accountable contact route is published via the Help Center 'Support Chat' and the official-channels list (https://app.zignaly.com/legal/terms-of-service, https://zignaly.com/about and https://help.zignaly.com/en/articles/8076093-how-to-avoid-scams, fetched 2026-07-22) — a named legal entity with jurisdiction and a contact route, so 2, noting the packet's residual risk observation that the pages do not clarify which of the two entities is responsible for a given user's funds.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no loss-inclusive public track record exists — the only performance publication is a single self-published monthly index report recorded as a provider claim, with no per-trade or per-manager record showing losses (https://zignaly.com/z-indexes/performance/report-december-2025, fetched 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the entity is identifiable from public sources — two named legal entities with registration numbers and jurisdictions (SVG and South Africa), an FSCA licence number, a registered office address, named founders and a 2018–2023 company timeline (https://app.zignaly.com/legal/terms-of-service and https://zignaly.com/about, fetched 2026-07-22). T3 fails because although pricing (10% success fee on net profits under a high-water mark; Wealth Manager fees illustrated at 25%) and a support route are observed, refundTerms is state not-found — the word 'refund' does not appear in the Terms of Service and only withdrawal mechanics are described (https://zignaly.com/ and https://app.zignaly.com/legal/terms-of-service, fetched 2026-07-22). T4 fails because public performance claims exist that cannot be reconciled — 'some wealth managers have achieved over 100% annual returns' for unnamed managers, the December 2025 index returns and the 'Margin Syndicate ≈ +43.2%' figure rest solely on internal marketplace data with no inspectable record, and the site's own headline user counts conflict (650,000+ vs 430k+) (https://zignaly.com/crypto-profit-sharing and https://zignaly.com/, fetched 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/