# WaveEdge - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/waveedge-crypto-signals-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
WaveEdge is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: WaveEdge
- Canonical entity record: WaveEdge
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: India-based Elliott Wave analysis and multiasset signal candidate
- Platform context: Web scanner / Telegram / WhatsApp / email / push alerts
- Language context: English
- Region context: India; New Delhi and an Udyam registration number are stated on the current site
- Known aliases: WaveEdge, WaveEdge app, WaveEdge.in, Gaurav Malhotra WaveEdge

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available: the packet's resultsEvidence observation is state not-found — the site's own analysis page, the natural home of a dated track record, displays 'No posts yet' with an exposed admin prompt (https://www.waveedge.in/blog.html, fetched 2026-07-22), the only performance figure is a provider-published '87.4% Backtested 2010-2025' headline with no definition, sample size, per-trade log, equity curve or auditor (https://www.waveedge.in/, fetched 2026-07-22), and the public Telegram feed carries only scattered intraday 'points booked' commentary on Nifty/Bank Nifty with no calendar dates and nothing that can be totalled or checked (https://t.me/s/ewagaurav, fetched 2026-07-22).; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point because a real person and jurisdiction are attributable — the home page names Gaurav Malhotra as founder and lead analyst, states the business is a proprietorship in New Delhi, India, and publishes the MSME registration UDYAM-DL-11-0157089 together with WhatsApp, Telegram and email contact routes (https://www.waveedge.in/, fetched 2026-07-22) — but level 2 is blocked because every detail is self-published with no independent confirmation in the packet (the WebSearch on the provider and founder names returned only waveedge.in's own pages), no postal address, GST number or verifiable professional profile is published, the operator states it is not a SEBI-registered Research Analyst, and both linked policy documents (/terms.html and /privacy.html) returned HTTP 404 so no correction or contractual route exists (https://www.waveedge.in/terms.html, fetched 2026-07-22).; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record showing losses exists — resultsEvidence is not-found, the analysis page is empty and the only figure is a backtest headline (https://www.waveedge.in/blog.html and https://www.waveedge.in/, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operator is identifiable from public sources: founder Gaurav Malhotra named, New Delhi, India jurisdiction stated, and UDYAM-DL-11-0157089 registration published on the official site (https://www.waveedge.in/, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because although a price table and support routes are published, refundTerms is state not-found — a verbatim re-read found no refund, cancellation or billing-dispute wording, the FAQ covers only Elliott Wave theory, and the linked terms-of-service and privacy pages both returned HTTP 404 (https://www.waveedge.in/terms.html, 2026-07-22) — and the price table itself prints two 'Professional' tiers at the same INR 2,499 with different features. T4 fails because the public performance claim '87.4% Backtested 2010-2025' cannot be reconciled against any inspected record (no definition, sample or log exists), and the channel bio's 'No tips | No hype | Only logic and education' is contradicted by the same-day public feed of directional index calls with levels and points-booked updates (https://www.waveedge.in/ and https://t.me/s/ewagaurav, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/