# Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич (@wallet_with_bitcoins) - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/wallet-with-bitcoins-alexey-chechukevich-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич (@wallet_with_bitcoins) is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич (@wallet_with_bitcoins)
- Canonical entity record: Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич (@wallet_with_bitcoins)
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed result sheet
- Profile type: Russian crypto education, bot-signal, and paid-club provider
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Russian
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич, wallet_with_bitcoins, @wallet_with_bitcoins, Wallet With Bitcoins, Alexey Chechukevich

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available: resultsEvidence is state not-found — no verifiable, timestamped trading track record was published on the channel preview, the div-invest.ru site, or the provider-run testimonials channel, the only performance material being self-published return claims (a ZEC bot at ~500% annualized, 15-45% pool yields) and student testimonials of 10-30% monthly, and the third-party editorial review states the operator maintains no trading statistics (sourceUrl https://scammer.ru/capper/moshenniki/obzor-koshelek-s-bitkoinami-aleksej-chechukevich/ and https://t.me/s/wallet_with_bitcoins, fetchedOn 2026-07-22); zero means no evidenced points, not a scam finding.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point because a real named person is attributable — Alexey Chechukevich fronts the channel by name and the affiliated academy site publishes individual entrepreneur (IP) Alexey Chechukevich with INN 772592767190, OGRNIP 321774600254056, Moscow, plus info@div-invest.ru and +7 499 325 39 16 (https://div-invest.ru, fetchedOn 2026-07-22) — but level 2 is withheld because those legal and contact details are published only on the sibling stock-market academy site, the packet's own missingProof records that it cannot confirm from primary sources that the crypto club/courses and the div-invest.ru academy are the same commercial offering beyond the shared name, and the reviewed crypto channel and its closed paid 'Команда Трейдеров' club publish no legal entity, terms, refund route, or contact of their own, enrollment being arranged via personal sales managers (https://t.me/s/divinvestotzyvy, 2026-07-22), so accountability for the reviewed service remains incomplete.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record of any kind exists — resultsEvidence is not-found and only self-published claims and testimonials were seen (https://t.me/s/wallet_with_bitcoins, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operator is identifiable from public sources: the channel is titled with the founder's name and the affiliated site names IP Alexey Chechukevich with INN/OGRNIP registration numbers and Moscow (https://div-invest.ru, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing is state not-found on every provider-controlled page fetched (no figures for the closed club or courses), refundTerms is state not-found, and enrollment is arranged through personal managers with installment financing rather than published terms (https://div-invest.ru and https://t.me/s/divinvestotzyvy, 2026-07-22). T4 fails because the provider's public performance claims — a bot yielding ~500% annualized, 15-45% yearly pool returns, 20,000-100,000 RUB/month from 10,000 RUB capital, graduate returns up to 25%/40% per year, and 10-30% monthly testimonials — cannot be reconciled against any inspected record, and a third-party review alleges the operator keeps no trading statistics (https://t.me/s/wallet_with_bitcoins, https://div-invest.ru, https://scammer.ru/capper/moshenniki/obzor-koshelek-s-bitkoinami-aleksej-chechukevich/, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/