# tradehadi /ترید هادی - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/trade-hadi-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-10

## Direct answer
tradehadi /ترید هادی is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: tradehadi /ترید هادی
- Canonical entity record: tradehadi /ترید هادی
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed result sheet
- Profile type: Signal / trading candidate
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Persian
- Region context: Iran
- Known aliases: trade_hadi

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 1/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because resultsEvidence is state not-found: no trade log, results sheet, monthly report, win-rate figure, profit statistic, screenshot archive, or third-party verification was published on any page fetched, and the public posts are forward-looking Persian-language analysis of BTC, dominance and gold with support/resistance levels that carry no summarised outcome record (https://t.me/s/trade_hadi, fetched 2026-07-22) — no usable, loss-inclusive result record exists, so 0 (no evidenced points, not a scam finding).; Identity and accountability 0/2 - Zero because operatorIdentity records only a single first-name brand persona 'tradehadi / ترید هادی' whose linked VIP channel is titled simply 'HADI' and whose Instagram bio describes the operator only as a financial-markets analyst, with no legal name, surname, company, registration number, jurisdiction, or regulatory status on any page fetched (https://www.instagram.com/trade__hadi/ and https://t.me/trade_hadi, fetched 2026-07-22); Persian-language posting is recorded as an audience indicator rather than a jurisdiction, and no dated longevity fact was observed, so nothing accountable is attributable.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record of any kind exists — the feed is forward-looking analysis with no closed-trade log or outcome summary (https://t.me/s/trade_hadi, 2026-07-22). T2 fails because the operator is identifiable only as the first-name persona 'Hadi' with no entity, jurisdiction, or evidenced longevity from public sources (https://www.instagram.com/trade__hadi/, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing, refundTerms and supportRoute are all state not-found — the VIP channel @tradehadi_vip publishes no price, terms, joining process or contact, and no support handle or email appears on any provider surface (https://t.me/tradehadi_vip and https://t.me/trade_hadi, 2026-07-22). T4 passes because the packet shows the public claims-surface was actually inspected across five surfaces (main channel card, public post feed, education channel, VIP channel preview, Instagram profile) and explicitly records that no win rate, accuracy percentage, profit figure, ROI, or performance guarantee appeared anywhere, the only non-performance claims being 'official TradeHadi channel' (corroborated by the Instagram bio linking t.me/trade_hadi) and 'financial-markets analyst', neither of which is contradicted by the inspected record (https://t.me/s/trade_hadi, https://t.me/trade_hadi, https://t.me/tradehadi_vip and https://www.instagram.com/trade__hadi/, all fetched 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/