# SeaAI Automated Crypto Futures Trading - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/seaaitrader-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-10

## Direct answer
SeaAI Automated Crypto Futures Trading is a Cornix-supported automation profile with broad futures and spot exchange coverage, a Telegram admin route, and a bot-style public route connected to automated futures signals.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: SeaAI Automated Crypto Futures Trading
- Canonical entity record: SeaAI Automated Crypto Futures Trading
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed result sheet
- Profile type: Cornix-supported signal provider candidate
- Platform context: Cornix / Telegram
- Language context: Multilingual
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: SeaAItrader, SeaAI Automated Crypto Futures Trading Cornix

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 1/4 - A dated public record exists and visibly includes losses — the free channel's feed carries weekly and monthly performance posts from 2026-04-06 to 2026-07-18 reporting win rate, trade count and P&L including losing periods such as 'WR 63.2% · P&L -246.5%', alongside individual closed-trade notices — but it is provider-published and self-calculated with no exchange statement, broker record, audit or independent reconciliation, and the P&L basis is undefined (https://t.me/s/SeaAI_Crypto_signals, fetched 2026-07-22): level 1.; Identity and accountability 0/2 - Identity stops at the unregistered trading name 'SeaAI Trading' and a self-selected England-and-Wales jurisdiction clause, with no named person, company registration number, registered office, postal address or founding year on any page, only an email and a personal Telegram account as contact, and under four months of observable history — the packet's own risk observation is that a disputant 'would have no identified counterparty to pursue in those courts' (https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/terms and https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/contact, fetched 2026-07-22): 0.; Public transparency 2/4 - T1 passes because the public channel's performance reporting shows losing weeks as well as winning ones, not wins only (https://t.me/s/SeaAI_Crypto_signals, fetched 2026-07-22). T2 fails because no name, platform-anchored longevity or evidenced jurisdiction identifies the operator from public sources — every identity fact is self-authored, the about page names no one, and the channel dates only to April 2026 (https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/about and https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/terms, fetched 2026-07-22). T3 passes because all three legs are observed published: exact plan prices with a 7-day trial (https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/pricing), an explicit non-refundable-by-default policy with a defined technical-failure exception and no-auto-renew expiry in the terms (https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/terms), and support routes of email plus a 24/7 Telegram contact on the contact page (https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/contact), all fetched 2026-07-22. T4 fails because the about page's 'daily and weekly accuracy consistently above 85%' is contradicted by the provider's own posted 63.2% week, the home page's headline counters rendered as unpopulated '0+ Signals per Week' and '0%+' placeholders against the over-150-signals-per-week claim, and the 135.29% three-month profit figure depends on 'recommended settings' that are nowhere published (https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/about, https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/, https://www.seaaitrading.co.uk/setup vs https://t.me/s/SeaAI_Crypto_signals, fetched 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/