# Quantum Trading (@QuantumTradingPRO) - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/quantum-trading-pro-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Quantum Trading (@QuantumTradingPRO) is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Quantum Trading (@QuantumTradingPRO)
- Canonical entity record: Quantum Trading (@QuantumTradingPRO)
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Directly rechecked Russian Telegram trading-analysis and crypto-call candidate
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Russian
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Quantum Trading, QuantumTradingPRO, @QuantumTradingPRO, Quantum Trading🔝

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 0/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: No points were evidenced in the dated, adjudicated packet. This is not a scam, safety or profitability conclusion.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available: resultsEvidence is state not-found — the public preview shows live entry/stop-loss/take-profit posts and position-management follow-ups but no audited record, exchange-verified export or third-party monitoring, the only figures (+719.28% ROI, +11,297 USDT over two weeks, 90% of trades profitable) are self-reported promotional text recorded under providerClaims, and the packet's riskObservations record that no disclosure of losing trades accompanied them (https://t.me/s/QuantumTradingPRO, fetched 2026-07-22).; Identity and accountability 0/2 - Zero because the operator is anonymous: operatorIdentity and teamDisclosure are state not-found — the bio claims only 'a team of professional traders' and an unnamed lead trader with 'more than 14 years' of experience, no company, individual, jurisdiction or website is disclosed, and the paid 'Quantum Coin' upsell is reachable only via a pseudonymous contact handle @Expert_TradOne (https://t.me/s/QuantumTradingPRO, fetched 2026-07-22).; Public transparency 0/4 - T1 fails because the visible feed shows signal posts and profit claims but no loss-inclusive track record — the packet expressly notes no disclosure of losing trades alongside the ROI claim (https://t.me/s/QuantumTradingPRO, 2026-07-22). T2 fails because no name, entity, jurisdiction or evidenced longevity is published; the 17.3K subscriber count is a forbidden popularity input and the '14 years' experience line is an unverifiable claim about an unnamed person (https://t.me/s/QuantumTradingPRO, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing, paymentMethods and refundTerms are all state not-found for the paid channel and the only support route is a DM to @Expert_TradOne (https://t.me/s/QuantumTradingPRO, 2026-07-22). T4 fails because the public performance claims '+719,28% ROI' in two weeks, '90% сделок закрываются в прибыль' and 'Официальные партнеры биржи Bybit' cannot be reconciled against any inspected record and the provider's only referenced reviews source is a self-linked Telegram channel, not an independent one (https://t.me/s/QuantumTradingPRO, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/