# امید فدوی | Omid Fadavi (@omidFadavi_com) - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/omidfadavi-com-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
امید فدوی | Omid Fadavi (@omidFadavi_com) is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: امید فدوی | Omid Fadavi (@omidFadavi_com)
- Canonical entity record: امید فدوی | Omid Fadavi (@omidFadavi_com)
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Directly rechecked named Persian Telegram crypto analyst and signal candidate
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Persian
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: امید فدوی | Omid Fadavi, omidFadavi_com, @omidFadavi_com, Omid Fadavi, امید فدوی

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record exists: the resultsEvidence observation (state observed, https://t.me/s/signal_omidfadavi, fetched 2026-07-22) records only operator-published profit-update posts reporting roughly 13%-60% gains on displayed trades, with no losing trades, trade log, or cumulative record shown, and the channel actually named 'results' (https://t.me/s/omidfadavi_natayej, fetched 2026-07-22) contains only repetitive promotional posts for a meme-coin AI strategy and a survey link with no profit/loss records or metrics — the level-1 loss-inclusive test is not met and no reviewer reconciliation exists.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point because a claimed real person is attributable — the service is fronted in the first person by the named analyst 'امید فدوی | Omid Fadavi', with the channels branded 'Omid Fadavi Academy' and 'Omid Fadavi Trading School' and a dedicated support handle @omidfadavi_support (operatorIdentity state observed, https://t.me/s/omidFadavi_com, fetched 2026-07-22) — but no legal entity, registration, jurisdiction, address, or independently verifiable real-name identity is disclosed on any of the four fetched channels and teamDisclosure is not-found, so accountability details remain incomplete and level 2 is not reachable.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because the only public results are gain-only self-reported profit updates (roughly 13%-60%) on the signals channel and the dedicated 'results' channel shows no trade records at all, so no public track record showing losses exists (https://t.me/s/signal_omidfadavi and https://t.me/s/omidfadavi_natayej, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operator is identifiable from public sources by name — the named persona Omid Fadavi fronts the main channel and the academy/trading-school branded channels in the first person (https://t.me/s/omidFadavi_com, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing is state not-found across all four channels, refundTerms is not-found, and paymentMethods is not-found; only a Telegram support handle is published, so the all-three test fails (https://t.me/s/omidfadavi_vip and https://t.me/s/omidFadavi_com, 2026-07-22). T4 fails because public performance claims exist — 'real dollar income' from experience since 2018, self-reported 13%-60% gains, and 'dollar income without capital' — but cannot be reconciled against any inspected record, and the channel named for results carries promotions rather than results (https://t.me/s/signal_omidfadavi and https://t.me/s/omidfadavi_vip, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/