# Monkey Trader - Крипто | Сигналы | Новости (@monkeytraderclub) - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/monkeytraderclub-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-10

## Direct answer
Monkey Trader - Крипто | Сигналы | Новости (@monkeytraderclub) is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Monkey Trader - Крипто | Сигналы | Новости (@monkeytraderclub)
- Canonical entity record: Monkey Trader - Крипто | Сигналы | Новости (@monkeytraderclub)
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed result sheet
- Profile type: Directly rechecked Telegram crypto signal channel candidate
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Russian
- Region context: Russia
- Known aliases: Monkey Trader - Крипто | Сигналы | Новости, monkeytraderclub, @monkeytraderclub

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-22
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-22
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 breakdown: Tracked record 2/2 - CSR confirmed 8 of 14 operating facts from dated public sources on 2026-07-22: official route, operator identity, free tier, access model, payment methods, refund terms, support route, platform delivery. The official route is among them and at least four facts are confirmed, which earns the full component. This credits CSR's own confirmed record, not the provider's performance, safety or profitability.; Result evidence 0/3 - Zero-reason: resultsEvidence is state not-found at https://t.me/s/monkeytraderclub (fetchedOn 2026-07-22) — no track record, win-rate table or trade-results evidence was observed on the public channel or the Teletype agreement (teletype.in/@monkeytraderadmin/pTprlTdCSLY, 2026-07-22); public posts are market commentary and news, and the five paid VIP channels where signals are delivered were not inspected.; Identity and accountability 0/2 - operatorIdentity (observed, https://teletype.in/@monkeytraderadmin/pTprlTdCSLY, 2026-07-22) attributes the service only to the pseudonymous 'Monkey Trader Admin' (@monkeytraderadmin) with no real name, company or legal entity, and teamDisclosure is not-found — the 'own team of traders' line is a providerClaims entry; no jurisdiction or accountable legal identity is evidenced anywhere in the packet.; Public transparency 1/3 - T1 fails because no loss-inclusive public track record was observed (resultsEvidence not-found, t.me/s/monkeytraderclub 2026-07-22); T2 fails because the operator is a pseudonymous admin handle with no name, entity or jurisdiction (teletype agreement, 2026-07-22); T3 fails because although refundTerms ('no refunds after payment') and a support route (@monkeytraderadmin) are published in the Teletype agreement, pricing is explicitly not published for any of the five VIP tiers, so the three-part test is not met; T4 passes because the packet inspected the public channel preview and the provider's own subscriber agreement, recorded no public performance claim (only 'own team of traders' and 'trades futures and spot'), and found nothing contradicted by the inspected record.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Tracked record: 0-2 points.
- Result evidence: 0-3 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-3 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/