# Intellectia AI - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/intellectia-ai-crypto-radar-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Intellectia AI is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Intellectia AI
- Canonical entity record: Intellectia AI
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Official multi-asset AI signal platform with dedicated crypto radar and alert features
- Platform context: Web app / Mobile app / AI signals / Crypto Radar
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Intellectia AI, Intellectia AI app, Intellectia.AI, Intellectia Crypto Radar, Crypto Spotlight

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is accessible: on the provider-operated Crypto Radar page (https://intellectia.ai/crypto-radar, fetched 2026-07-22) the asset tickers were masked behind unlock prompts, the closed-trade history behind the 'Closed' tab was not viewable, the provider's own FAQ labels the dashboard returns theoretical, and no third-party audit, exchange-verified record or downloadable trade log was found.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - The iOS App Store listing (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/intellectia-ai-trading-signal/id6743067049, fetched 2026-07-22) names the seller as INTELLECTIA(HONG KONG)LIMITED and the about page names founder & CEO Fei Chen with a detailed biography, so a real person and claimed entity are attributable, but no registration number is published and the packet flags that the contracting entity is unclear between the Hong Kong company and the Denver, Colorado contact address, leaving legal accountability incomplete.; Public transparency 2/4 - T1 fails because no loss-inclusive public track record is visible — tickers are masked, the closed-trade history is hidden, and only aggregate stat readouts are shown. T2 passes because founder & CEO Fei Chen is named with a biography on the public about page (https://intellectia.ai/about, fetched 2026-07-22) and the entity INTELLECTIA(HONG KONG)LIMITED appears on the Apple App Store listing. T3 passes because pricing amounts for all tiers and add-ons (https://intellectia.ai/pricing), a detailed refund policy plus explicit cancellation routes (User Profile > Billing for web purchases, the respective store for app purchases) in the terms (https://intellectia.ai/terms-of-service), and support terms including email, US phone, Denver postal address and a contact form (https://intellectia.ai/contact) are all published. T4 fails because the 72.22% 30-day win rate cannot be reconciled against any named, timestamped trade list (the packet states a prospective buyer cannot check it before subscribing), the 18,627.10% annualised figure is qualified as theoretical only in a FAQ far below the headline, and the site's claimed 4.8 App Store rating differed from the 4.7 shown on the listing fetched the same day.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/