# Ichi's Trading Place - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/ichis-trading-place-discord-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: index, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Ichi's Trading Place is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Ichi's Trading Place
- Canonical entity record: Ichi's Trading Place
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Official Discord TradingView scanner and signal-indicator candidate with crypto coverage
- Platform context: Discord / Web
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Ichi's Trading Place, Ichi's Trading Place Discord, Ichis Trading Place, Ichi's Indicator, Ichis Indicator

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record was actually available: the trade-log and scanner pages are structured for results but rendered no rows, totals, win rate, or trade count to the research fetch, so no figure of any kind is recorded (https://ichistradingplace.com/trade-log/, fetched 2026-07-22), and what the surfaces would show is operator-produced tracking with no exchange link, auditor, or independent reconciliation.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - A claimed legal entity and jurisdiction are attributable — the terms are issued by Ichi's Trading Place LLC under Colorado, USA governing law with Colorado courts, effective 2026-02-01 (https://ichistradingplace.com/terms/, fetched 2026-07-22) — but accountability details remain incomplete: no registration number, business address, officer, or personal name exists anywhere, the operator being only the pseudonym 'Ichi'.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record with visible losses was observed — the trade log and scanner rendered no data rows at all (https://ichistradingplace.com/trade-log/, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the entity is identifiable from public sources by name and jurisdiction: Ichi's Trading Place LLC, State of Colorado, published in the site's own terms (https://ichistradingplace.com/terms/, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing is not transparently published — the operator's own pages conflict, with the store selling $49.99/month including scanner access while the scanner page gates 1H/30M/15M behind a 'Pro Members' $50/month that the packet records as unresolvable (https://ichistradingplace.com/scanner/, 2026-07-22), and the contact page's discuss-a-refund invitation contradicts the binding all-sales-final clause. T4 fails because performance-bearing claims ('No Repainting. Ever!', 'All closed trades. Real entries, real exits. Updated daily.', 'Real entries, real exits... No simulated results.') exist but cannot be reconciled since no data rendered on either results surface, and the claimed crypto coverage appears in no worked example, scanner list, or log surface fetched (https://ichistradingplace.com/all-features/, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/