# Decryptr AI - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/decryptr-ai-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Decryptr AI is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Decryptr AI
- Canonical entity record: Decryptr AI
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Beta crypto intelligence, AI-labeled signal, wallet-alert, and execution-app candidate
- Platform context: Web app / Discord route
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Decryptr AI, Decryptr AI Discord, Decryptr.ai

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 1/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record exists: the packet's resultsEvidence observation is state not-found — no downloadable trade log, verified track record or external audit is published on any fetched page, the disclaimers page itself makes no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any signal (sourceUrl https://www.decryptr.ai/disclaimers, fetchedOn 2026-07-22), and the only figure anywhere is the provider-stated 65-72% one-hour hit-rate for score>=80 signals held under providerClaims (https://www.decryptr.ai/faq, 2026-07-22), which is a claim and not a record.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point on the jurisdiction prong only: the operatorIdentity observation (state observed, https://www.decryptr.ai/about, fetchedOn 2026-07-22) and the terms page (https://www.decryptr.ai/terms, 2026-07-22) record that the operator publicly binds itself to the laws of England and Wales, discloses it is 'not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority' and grants UK consumers the statutory 14-day cooling-off right, so a jurisdiction is attributable — but the two co-founders are given only as the handles 'Dimz' and 'Pentiath', the brand was established 2025 with no meaningful longevity, and no registered company legal name, registration number or physical address is published on any fetched page, so legal/accountability details remain incomplete and level 2 is unreachable.; Public transparency 0/4 - T1 fails because no public track record of any kind, loss-inclusive or otherwise, exists — resultsEvidence is state not-found (https://www.decryptr.ai/disclaimers, 2026-07-22). T2 fails because the operator is not identifiable from public sources: the about page names only the pseudonymous handles 'Dimz' and 'Pentiath', no legal entity or address is disclosed, the brand dates only from 2025 so no meaningful longevity exists, and a governing-law clause alone does not identify who operates the platform (https://www.decryptr.ai/about, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing is not published — the pricing observation is state not-found with the pricing page showing 'Pricing coming soon' and 'under maintenance' while the FAQ and terms already describe paid USD billing and a 20% annual discount (https://www.decryptr.ai/pricing, 2026-07-22) — even though a detailed refund policy (https://www.decryptr.ai/refund) and support route (support@decryptr.ai, https://www.decryptr.ai/faq) are published, so the all-three test fails. T4 fails because a public performance claim exists — 'score >= 80 ... in roughly 65-72% of cases within 1 hour' (https://www.decryptr.ai/faq, 2026-07-22) — but no trade log, results page or third-party record was found against which it could be reconciled, and the disclaimers page disclaims any warranty as to signal accuracy.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/