# Crypto Investidor (@CryptoInvestidor) - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/cryptoinvestidor-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-10

## Direct answer
Crypto Investidor (@CryptoInvestidor) is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Crypto Investidor (@CryptoInvestidor)
- Canonical entity record: Crypto Investidor (@CryptoInvestidor)
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed result sheet
- Profile type: Directly rechecked Portuguese Telegram crypto spot and futures signal candidate
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Portuguese
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Crypto Investidor, CryptoInvestidor, @CryptoInvestidor

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because the only public result record is provider-produced Telegram screenshots with checkmarks on filled targets showing wins only (https://t.me/s/CryptoInvestidor, fetched 2026-07-22); no dated, loss-inclusive result record was observed anywhere in the packet, and the packet itself records that the screenshots cannot be externally verified.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point because Diego Consimo is named as instructor and public face and the site footer publishes Brazilian company registration CNPJ 30.680.778/0001-50 (https://cryptoinvestidor.com/, fetched 2026-07-22), so a real person, claimed entity and jurisdiction are attributable; but the legal entity's name is not recorded, the CNPJ was not checked against any registry, and no confirmed accountability/correction route ties the person to the entity, so legal details remain incomplete (not 2).; Public transparency 2/4 - T1 fails because the only public track record is win screenshots with filled-target checkmarks and no visible losses (https://t.me/s/CryptoInvestidor, fetched 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operator is publicly identifiable by name (Diego Consimo) plus a published Brazilian CNPJ 30.680.778/0001-50 on the official site (https://cryptoinvestidor.com/, fetched 2026-07-22). T3 passes because pricing (CI PRO BRL 1,519.80/year or 12x R$149), refund/cancellation terms (7-day unconditional guarantee, cancel anytime via sac@cryptoinvestidor.net) and support routes (WhatsApp wa.link/czhn6t plus email) are all published (https://cryptoinvestidor.com/ci-pro and https://linktr.ee/cryptoinvestidor, fetched 2026-07-22). T4 fails because the provider's own pages state conflicting mapped-operation counts (+2900 on the home page vs +2600 on the CI-PRO page) and the 71% accuracy / 8.1% avg profit / +1625x figures carry no period or methodology, so the public performance claims cannot be reconciled with the inspected record (https://cryptoinvestidor.com/, fetched 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/