# CryptoBosh Trading Bots (@cryptobosh_bots) - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/cryptobosh-trading-bots-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
CryptoBosh Trading Bots (@cryptobosh_bots) is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: CryptoBosh Trading Bots (@cryptobosh_bots)
- Canonical entity record: CryptoBosh Trading Bots (@cryptobosh_bots)
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Crypto trading-bot configuration and automation provider
- Platform context: Telegram / Web / Veles / Hyperliquid
- Language context: Russian
- Region context: Russian-speaking market; operator location not verified
- Known aliases: CryptoBosh Trading Bots, cryptobosh_bots, @cryptobosh_bots, CryptoBosh, CryptoBosh Bots, Boshnikov Trading

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because resultsEvidence is state not-accessible: the channel bio says it publishes results ('результаты') but no result content rendered through the public preview and the flagged updated-Veles-settings/profitability post https://t.me/cryptobosh/2083 did not render, so no figure, loss or trade log was observed and providerClaims is empty (sourceUrl https://t.me/cryptobosh_bots, fetchedOn 2026-07-22); no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available and silence earns zero.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point because a claimed real person is attributable: the operatorIdentity observation records that the service runs under the personal 'Boshnikov / КриптоБош' brand, that the official site boshnikov.com presents 'Boshnikov' as operator, and that the main channel links a personal DEX channel @Yuriyboshnikov with brand support at @boshnikov_help (https://boshnikov.com and https://t.me/cryptobosh, fetched 2026-07-22); but no legal entity, company registration, jurisdiction, address or named responsible individual for the bots service is disclosed, so accountability details remain incomplete and level 2 is not reachable.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no loss-inclusive public track record was observed — the results content the bio advertises was not-accessible and the /2083 post did not render (https://t.me/cryptobosh_bots, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operator is identifiable from public sources by name: the official brand site boshnikov.com presents 'Boshnikov' as operator of the personal КриптоБош brand and the main channel links the personal @Yuriyboshnikov channel (https://boshnikov.com and https://t.me/cryptobosh, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because pricing and refundTerms for the bots service are not-found — the 24€/month price and /politika-vozvrata refund page on https://boshnikov.com/trade belong to the separate AGMI trading-chat product, as the packet explicitly notes — leaving only a support route (@boshnikov_help) published (https://boshnikov.com, 2026-07-22). T4 fails because a performance claim exists (a search result flagged https://t.me/cryptobosh/2083 as a profitability announcement) but could not be rendered or reconciled, and the bots channel's own post feed was not inspected (preview exposed no dated posts), so the claims-surface was not actually inspected (https://t.me/cryptobosh_bots, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/