# Crypto Quality Signals - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/crypto-quality-signals-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
Crypto Quality Signals is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Crypto Quality Signals
- Canonical entity record: Crypto Quality Signals
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Crypto signal dashboard and Telegram/Discord delivery candidate
- Platform context: Web dashboard / Telegram / Discord / external trading bots
- Language context: English public site; additional community languages not audited
- Region context: Not publicly established
- Known aliases: Crypto Quality Signals, Crypto Quality Signals app, CQS, Crypto Quality Signals Premium

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 0/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: No points were evidenced in the dated, adjudicated packet. This is not a scam, safety or profitability conclusion.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available: the observed resultsEvidence surface is the public /signals ledger whose every visible row is status Open with signal ID, timestamp, pair and direction only — no closed-trade outcome, profit/loss column, win rate or accuracy figure (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/signals, fetchedOn 2026-07-22) — and the referenced CQS Premium Results channel exposed only a 223-subscriber preview with no posts visible (https://t.me/CQS_Premium_Results, fetchedOn 2026-07-22), while the 'daily reports' said to prove profitability were not retrievable from any public page.; Identity and accountability 0/2 - Zero because operatorIdentity is state not-found: the about page names no operating company, jurisdiction, registration number, founder or staff member (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/about, fetchedOn 2026-07-22), teamDisclosure is not-found, and the only longevity indications — 'started as a Telegram group in 2018' on the about page and an eighth-anniversary coupon banner on the home page — are self-published statements with no observed dated archive, third-party record or entity behind them, so the operator remains anonymous and unsupported.; Public transparency 0/4 - T1 fails because the only public track record is an all-Open signal ledger with no closed outcomes and therefore no losses shown (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/signals, 2026-07-22). T2 fails because no name, legal entity or jurisdiction is published anywhere and the 2018 origin story is self-claimed on the about page with no observed dated evidence of longevity (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/about, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because although a plan table is published (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/plans, 2026-07-22), the refund position is a one-sentence first-month guarantee limited to website purchases and once per customer with no terms document, processing window, claim procedure or cancellation route for the recurring subscription, the home-page 50% coupon is not repeated on the plans page, and the home page itself states subscriptions are 'under development' mid-rebuild (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/about and https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/, 2026-07-22), so refund/cancellation terms are not transparently published. T4 fails because the public claim that 'daily reports have proven that they are profitable' cannot be reconciled — the daily reports were not reachable from any public page and the inspected ledger shows no closed-trade outcomes at all (https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/about and https://cryptoqualitysignals.com/signals, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/