# Crypto Pump Island - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/crypto-pump-island-6280-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-10

## Direct answer
Crypto Pump Island is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Crypto Pump Island
- Canonical entity record: Crypto Pump Island
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed result sheet
- Profile type: Signal / trading channel candidate
- Platform context: Telegram Channel
- Language context: Multilingual
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: None published

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 0/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: No points were evidenced in the dated, adjudicated packet. This is not a scam, safety or profitability conclusion.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available: resultsEvidence is state observed but describes only provider-authored take-profit lines ('#COTI/USDT All take-profit targets achieved Profit: 100%', OGN 17%, ACH 16%, TLM 24%, RIF 59%, DEXE 33%), dated daily 'result' posts and a 'June 2026 profit results' summary, all recorded under providerClaims and readable only through a third-party statistics mirror because Telegram's /s/ preview redirects away and single-post embeds print 'Please open Telegram to view this post' (https://tgstat.com/channel/@crypto_pump_island and https://t.me/crypto_pump_island/81777?embed=1, fetched 2026-07-30); no loss line, entry/exit timestamp, order or account statement, equity curve or third-party audit appears anywhere, and the 'Crypto Pump Island Premium' channel the results are forwarded from is not publicly reachable, so the record is neither visibly loss-inclusive nor publicly inspectable and cannot reach level 1.; Identity and accountability 0/2 - Zero because the operator is anonymous: operatorIdentity and teamDisclosure are both state not-found — no personal name, company, jurisdiction or registration on the channel page, the catalog listing or the mirror, the channel writes as an unnamed 'we', and the only operator-linked identifier, the premium contact @APGLOBALS, resolves to a bare Telegram contact card with no name, bio, entity or website (https://t.me/APGLOBALS and https://t.me/crypto_pump_island, fetched 2026-07-30), so no accountable party is attached to either the calls or the payments.; Public transparency 0/4 - T1 fails because the only public performance material is provider profit lines and result summaries with no losses visible, and the post bodies are withheld from the open web so no loss-inclusive record can be seen (https://tgstat.com/channel/@crypto_pump_island, 2026-07-30). T2 fails because no name, entity or jurisdiction is published and no dated longevity is evidenced — 120,855 subscribers is a popularity figure and a forbidden input, and the mirror's 'World, English' tag is a directory classification (https://t.me/crypto_pump_island, 2026-07-30). T3 fails because a paid 'Premium' tier is sold only by direct message to @APGLOBALS with pricing not-found, refundTerms not-found and no support route beyond that same handle (https://t.me/crypto_pump_island, 2026-07-30). T4 fails because the public performance claims (100% COTI in 20 hours, daily and monthly profit results) cannot be reconciled against any inspectable record since the source premium channel is unreachable, and the catalog's exchange list (Binance, Bittrex, HitBtc, Cryptopia, Yobit) conflicts with the live bio's Binance-only description with nothing resolving the difference (https://realtelegram.com/channels/6280 and https://t.me/crypto_pump_island, 2026-07-30).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/