# Coinpilot - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/coinpilot-copy-trading-app-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
Coinpilot is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Coinpilot
- Canonical entity record: Coinpilot
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Self-custodial crypto and prediction-market copy-trading app candidate
- Platform context: iOS / Android / Hyperliquid / Polymarket
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Coinpilot, Coinpilot app, Coinpilot AI Trading Copilot

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because resultsEvidence is state not-found: no historical returns, win-rate statistics, backtest data or audited copy-trading results appear on any docs page fetched, and the Discover pages state only that a 'proprietary AI algorithm' ranks traders by profitability, consistency, drawdown and capital efficiency without publishing any figure or methodology (sourceUrl https://docs.coinpilot.com/resources/faqs/general.md and https://docs.coinpilot.com/discover-traders/discover-overview.md, fetchedOn 2026-07-22), so no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - The iOS App Store listing that the docs link as the official download names the publishing developer 'Coinpilot Limited' (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/coinpilot/id6747697788, fetched 2026-07-22) and the docs publish support@coinpilot.com and a Discord support-ticket route (https://docs.coinpilot.com/llms-full.txt and https://docs.coinpilot.com/resources/contact-support.md, 2026-07-22), so a claimed entity is attributable, but the docs' About and FAQ pages disclose no legal entity, incorporation jurisdiction, registered address or named team member and the entity name appears on no Coinpilot-controlled page, so legal and accountability details remain incomplete - level 1.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record exists - resultsEvidence is not-found across every docs page fetched (https://docs.coinpilot.com/resources/faqs/general.md, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operator is identifiable by name from a public source: 'Coinpilot Limited' is the developer on the App Store listing that the docs themselves publish as the official iOS download (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/coinpilot/id6747697788 and https://docs.coinpilot.com/resources/get-coinpilot-mobile-app.md, 2026-07-22). T3 fails because although an exact fee schedule is published (USD 1 activation, 0.05% platform fee, up to 0.045% Hyperliquid pass-through, 1% prediction-market fee) and support routes exist, refundTerms is state not-found on the fees, FAQ, about and troubleshooting pages (https://docs.coinpilot.com/resources/fees.md, 2026-07-22). T4 fails because performance-flavoured public claims exist - 'Trade like the top 0.01%' and 'Discover top-performing crypto traders' / 'Explore winning traders' - and no inspected record, methodology or figure reconciles any of them (https://docs.coinpilot.com/getting-started/about-coinpilot.md and https://docs.coinpilot.com/discover-traders/discover-overview.md, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/