# ChartPrime - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/chartprime-discord-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: index, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
ChartPrime is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: ChartPrime
- Canonical entity record: ChartPrime
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Official Discord multi-market TradingView signal and indicator candidate with explicit crypto coverage
- Platform context: Discord / Web
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: ChartPrime, ChartPrime Discord, Chart Prime, ChartPrime Pro, Prophecy Signals

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable result record exists: resultsEvidence is state not-found — no results table, per-trade log, win-rate history, backtest, or broker-linked account on any page fetched despite real-time signals with TP/SL levels being the Pro tier's headline feature, and the testimonials page (https://chartprime.com/testimonials, fetched 2026-07-22) rendered only unreadable screenshot images with no numbers.; Identity and accountability 1/2 - One point because real persons are attributable — a dedicated team page names six people with roles and biographies, five with surnames, including Alexander Fernandez as co-founder/CEO (https://chartprime.com/team, fetched 2026-07-22) — but the corporate layer is absent: no legal entity name, company type, registration number, operating jurisdiction, or business address appears on any page fetched, and both guessed paths for the terms document returned HTTP 404, so level 2's jurisdiction-plus-accountable-route test fails.; Public transparency 2/4 - T1 fails because no public track record exists at all — no results, win-rate, or trade log on any page, and the testimonials page shows only unreadable images (https://chartprime.com/testimonials, 2026-07-22). T2 passes because the operators are identifiable from public sources: six named people with roles on https://chartprime.com/team (2026-07-22) and a public TradingView account created 14 May 2022 with 145.2K followers, 143 published scripts, and activity 38 minutes before the fetch (https://www.tradingview.com/u/ChartPrime/, 2026-07-22). T3 passes because all three elements are published: full two-tier monthly/annual pricing on the home page (https://chartprime.com/, 2026-07-22), a dedicated refund and cancellation policy with a 7-day window and defined process, and support terms including support@chartprime.com with a stated two-business-day response time and a 24/7 live support route (https://chartprime.com/refund-policy, 2026-07-22). T4 fails because performance claims exist — 'Accurate Signals' and tools that 'consistently identify the best entry and exit points' (https://chartprime.com/, 2026-07-22) — but no performance data whatsoever is published to reconcile them against, and the same pages carry the provider's own contrary disclaimer that no tool or system can guarantee accurate market predictions.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/