# Bobot - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/bobot-crypto-alerts-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
Bobot is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Bobot
- Canonical entity record: Bobot
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Telegram crypto-alert and optional Binance-automation candidate
- Platform context: Web dashboard / Telegram bot / Telegram channel / Binance automation
- Language context: English public site and Telegram routes
- Region context: Not publicly established
- Known aliases: Bobot, Bobot app, Bobot Alerts, PriceAlertHelperBot

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 1/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - Zero because no usable, loss-inclusive result record is available: resultsEvidence is state not-found — the homepage shows one static example alert card (DOTUSDT 'Strong Buy', 100% score) as a UI illustration rather than a documented outcome, the '90-day signal accuracy tracking' is a paid Master-plan feature not a public record, the FAQ's 'dashboard' has no discoverable URL, and the 65-70% win rate is a providerClaim with no viewable ledger behind it (https://bobot.live/, fetched 2026-07-22).; Identity and accountability 0/2 - Zero because the operator is anonymous: operatorIdentity and teamDisclosure are state not-found — no founder, team member, operating company, legal entity, registration or jurisdiction appears on any fetched page, missingProof records that no terms-of-service or legal-entity page is linked from the homepage, the site trades only as the brand 'Bobot Alerts' with a support@bobot.live address, and no dated longevity is evidenced (the linked channel shows 27 subscribers and the footer only a 2026 copyright) (https://bobot.live/, fetched 2026-07-22).; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record of any kind exists — resultsEvidence is not-found and the only performance surface is a static example alert card plus an unlinked 'dashboard' reference (https://bobot.live/, 2026-07-22). T2 fails because no name, entity, jurisdiction or evidenced longevity identifies the operator — only the brand 'Bobot Alerts', a Telegram bot @PriceAlertHelperBot and a 27-subscriber channel (https://bobot.live/ and https://t.me/bobot_alerts_en, 2026-07-22). T3 passes because all three elements are state observed with sources: a three-tier price table (Free USD 0 / Pro 5 TON per month / Master 30 TON per month at https://bobot.live/#pricing), a published refund and cancellation position in the FAQ ('we don't offer refunds', monthly billing with no auto-renewal so 'no cancellation needed', 7-day Pro trial) at https://bobot.live/#faq, and a published support route (support@bobot.live with 6-hour Pro / 12-hour Master response targets) in the footer and FAQ (https://bobot.live/#faq, all fetched 2026-07-22). T4 fails because public performance claims exist — 'around 65-70% win rate' tracked 'on our dashboard' and a comparison table putting Bobot at 65-70% versus ~50% manual and 45-55% other bots — but the referenced dashboard has no discoverable URL and no record was inspectable, and the separate 'Trusted by 200+ active crypto traders' claim could not be reconciled with the 27-subscriber public channel (https://bobot.live/#faq, https://bobot.live/#pricing and https://t.me/bobot_alerts_en, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/