# Block Research - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/block-research-discord-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Block Research is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Block Research
- Canonical entity record: Block Research
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Official Discord crypto-bot, webhook execution and strategy-builder candidate
- Platform context: Discord / Web
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Block Research, Block Research Discord, blockresearch.ai, block algo flex, vyn premium, SignalPipe

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 2/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - The packet's resultsEvidence observation is state not-found: 'No independently verifiable or audited public performance track record was found' — the vyn premium page offers only a private per-subscriber P&L dashboard and a 'free research' email opt-in for backtest data, with no public results ledger or third-party audit (sourceUrl https://blockresearch.ai/vyn-premium, fetchedOn 2026-07-22).; Identity and accountability 1/2 - The legal notice names registered sole proprietor Timo Bautsch, Schroederstr. 49, 18055 Rostock, Germany, tax ID 44/074/12244, contact info@blockresearch.ai (https://blockresearch.ai/legal-notice, fetchedOn 2026-07-22) — a named person, jurisdiction, and contact route are attributable, but the disclosure is entirely self-published and the packet records no independent confirmation of the registration or tax ID, so the tier-2 'confirmed' requirement is not satisfied and this remains tier 1.; Public transparency 1/4 - T1 fails because no public track record exists — resultsEvidence is not-found and performance is visible only in each subscriber's private dashboard. T2 passes because the operator is identifiable from the published personal name, street address, German jurisdiction, and tax ID on the legal notice (https://blockresearch.ai/legal-notice, fetchedOn 2026-07-22). T3 fails because although pricing ($0/$29/$4,449) and support emails are published, refund/cancellation terms are not transparently published for the product actually sold: the detailed 105% guarantee governs a 'vyn premium Lifetime Package' while the product page sells a $4,449/year plan and separately states only a plain '30-day refund policy', and the packet's riskObservation records it is 'not clear from the pages reviewed whether these are the same purchase option or whether the detailed Lifetime-Package refund conditions actually govern the annual plan a buyer would purchase today' (https://blockresearch.ai/105-money-back-guarantee---terms-conditions, fetchedOn 2026-07-22). T4 fails because public performance claims exist (testimonials of 13%, 75%, 14%, and 90% returns plus 'ten years of live execution experience') and the packet records no inspected record reconciling any of them.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/