# Biyond - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/biyond-discord-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-11

## Direct answer
Biyond is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Biyond
- Canonical entity record: Biyond
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Crypto analysis, quantitative indicator, discretionary trade-blotter, and Discord candidate
- Platform context: Discord / Web
- Language context: English
- Region context: Global
- Known aliases: Biyond, Biyond Discord, Biyond Crypto Analysis, Nirmata, Hawkeye, Vanguard

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 3/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave1
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: A bounded evidence score for the cited research date; it is not a profitability forecast, customer rating or provider-verification status.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - The packet's resultsEvidence observation is state not-found: 'No independently viewable or audited track record was found' — the Pro tier references trade signals 'with track record' but no record is displayed, dedicated /results and /faq pages returned HTTP 404, and the only performance figure anywhere is a homepage testimonial recorded under providerClaims (sourceUrl https://biyond.co/pricing, fetchedOn 2026-07-22).; Identity and accountability 1/2 - The contact page discloses 'Biyond Trader LLC, 30 N Gould St Ste R, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, USA' and the about-us page names leadership Nathan Batchelor and Burkan Beyli with LinkedIn profiles referenced (https://biyond.co/about-us and https://biyond.co/contact, fetchedOn 2026-07-22), so a named entity, jurisdiction, and people are attributable, but everything is self-published, the firm self-discloses it is 'not registered with any financial regulatory agency', and the packet contains no independent confirmation of the LLC — tier 2's confirmed bar is not met.; Public transparency 2/4 - T1 fails because no public track record of any kind is viewable — resultsEvidence is not-found and /results returns 404. T2 passes because the entity is identifiable from the published LLC name and Wyoming address on the contact page and two named leaders on about-us (https://biyond.co/about-us, https://biyond.co/contact, fetchedOn 2026-07-22). T3 passes because the full plan table is published on /pricing, a '15-Day Money-Back Guarantee' refund term is published on the same page, and support terms (support@biyond.co, Discord 'subscriber-support' tickets, web contact form) are published on /contact, all observed 2026-07-22. T4 fails because public claims exist — the 'More than 200% ROI using it since 30 days' homepage testimonial, the Pro-tier 'trade signals with track record', and the head trader's 'accredited track record' — and the track-record claims are directly contradicted by the packet's finding that no viewable record exists anywhere on the site.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/