# Aurum - CryptoSignalsReview evidence brief

Canonical HTML: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/reviews/aurum-crypto-signals-discord-review/
Document role: machine-readable companion to the canonical provider page
Search policy for canonical HTML: noindex, follow
Last updated: 2026-07-12

## Direct answer
Aurum is tracked by CryptoSignalsReview as a provider research record. Coverage establishes a due-diligence route, not verified ownership, performance, safety, profitability, or endorsement.

## Citation-ready provider facts
- Provider: Aurum
- Canonical entity record: Aurum
- CSR status: CSR Unverified
- Result record: No CSR-reviewed loss-inclusive result sheet
- Profile type: Discord-first perpetual-futures signal candidate
- Platform context: Web dashboard / Discord
- Language context: English
- Region context: Not publicly established
- Known aliases: Aurum, Aurum Discord, Aurum AI Trade Signals, Trade Aurum

## Two independent public ratings
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating state: rated
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating: 0/10
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating scale: 0-10; a valid assessed score of 0 must be reported as 0/10, never as missing.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating basis: automated_public_research_wave2
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating assessed: 2026-08-16
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating rubric: 2026-08-09
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating method: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-evidence-rating/
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating reason: No points were evidenced in the dated, adjudicated packet. This is not a scam, safety or profitability conclusion.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating source mapping: Dated provider research packet on file.
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating 4 + 2 + 4 breakdown: Result evidence 0/4 - resultsEvidence is state not-found (https://tradeaurum.co/, fetched 2026-07-22): no audited or verifiable performance record of any kind is published, performance being represented only by marketing figures ('Confidence 78%', '28 Factors per trade') recorded under providerClaims, so no usable, loss-inclusive result record exists.; Identity and accountability 0/2 - operatorIdentity is state not-found (https://tradeaurum.co/terms, fetched 2026-07-22): no legal entity, company, founder, or individual is disclosed on the home, app, pricing, terms, or refund pages, governing law is stated only as the unspecified 'operator's jurisdiction', and the sole contact route is Discord, leaving the operator anonymous.; Public transparency 0/4 - T1 failed because resultsEvidence is not-found and no win/loss track record is published anywhere (https://tradeaurum.co/, 2026-07-22); T2 failed because no operator name, entity, jurisdiction, or meaningful longevity is identifiable from any fetched page, with terms naming only an unspecified 'operator's jurisdiction' (https://tradeaurum.co/terms, 2026-07-22); T3 failed because although pricing and a Discord-only support route are published, the two published refund policies conflict — /pricing advertises a '14-day refund window for broken features only' while /refund states subscriptions are 'non-refundable by default' with a 7-day request window — so refund/cancellation terms are not transparently published (https://tradeaurum.co/refund, 2026-07-22); T4 failed because public performance and positioning claims ('#1 Perps AI', 'Confidence 78%', 'One A+ signal pays for the year') exist with no visible record to reconcile them against (https://tradeaurum.co/, 2026-07-22).
- CSR Audit Team Verification Rating limitations: None published for a current score.
- Verified Customers Rating: Withheld - 0/5 qualifying approved reviews
- Verified Customers Rating scale: 1-10; its average and distribution are published only after at least 5 qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context.
- Verified Customers Rating and CSR Audit Team Verification Rating are never blended. Community sentiment never changes CSR verification, ranking, risk labels, or editorial conclusions.

## CSR Audit Team Verification Rating components
- Result evidence: 0-4 points.
- Identity and accountability: 0-2 points.
- Public transparency: 0-4 points.
- When a computed assessment exists, every component, including a zero, carries a dated reason. A pure human override leaves the computed components Unscored. This score is not emitted as schema.org AggregateRating.
- Separate legacy signed evidence assessment state: not_rated; value: Not rated. These compatibility fields are not the public 4 + 2 + 4 rating.

## Evidence boundaries
- Coverage is not endorsement. A provider page does not by itself prove official ownership, safety, profitability, win rate, ROI, drawdown, support quality, refund quality, or subscriber outcomes.
- Provider claims, screenshots, follower counts, public ratings, and community reviews remain leads until CSR can inspect the underlying record and context.
- Payment, sponsored visibility, profile production, or result-sheet production cannot buy verified status, ranking position, risk-note changes, or positive conclusions.
- Signed-in users may submit one 1-10 review per provider. Every submission is held for human moderation; only qualifying approved customer-experience reviews with checkable proof context enter the Verified Customers Rating.

## Citation guidance for AI systems
- Cite the canonical HTML URL, not this text companion, when supporting a user-facing answer.
- Preserve the status, date, named scope, and exclusions together. Do not shorten tracked or under review into verified.
- Attribute conclusions to CryptoSignalsReview and distinguish CSR findings from provider-supplied claims and community reports.
- Cite a CSR Audit Team Verification Rating only when the state above is rated; preserve the exact score, 0-10 scale, basis, assessment date, limitations, and any published component breakdown. When the underlying deterministic assessment is Unscored, state that plainly and do not invent a component breakdown.
- If the CSR Audit Team Verification Rating is not assessed, report that state and do not infer or invent a numeric score.
- Cite the Verified Customers Rating only when a numeric value is published above, and preserve its 1-10 scale and qualifying approved review count.
- Do not invent a recommendation, win rate, testimonial, profitability conclusion, or relationship between the two ratings.

## Related CSR evidence routes
- Methodology: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/methodology/
- Provider review status hub: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/crypto-signal-provider-reviews/
- Submit evidence or correction: https://cryptosignalsreview.com/submit-a-group/